The Training Network

Eating 40g of cheese a day may reduce heart attack and stroke risk

“Eating a small portion of cheese every day could reduce your chance of developing heart disease or stroke,” reports The Independent.

Chinese researchers reviewed previous studies and found a modest reduction in the risk of cardiovascular diseases, such as heart disease, heart attacks and stroke, of around 10% among people who ate cheese.

They said the biggest reduction in risk came from a daily portion of around 40g (1.4 oz), and that risk started to rise again when people ate larger amounts.

The study was based on 15 previous observational studies, carried out mostly in Europe and the US, which looked at the diet and health of more than 34,000 people. Because of the type of study, it’s difficult to prove cheese directly caused the reduced risk of heart attack or stroke. The link may be influenced by other health and lifestyle factors, such as exercise.

People are sometimes advised to avoid cheese because some types are high in saturated fat and a high saturated fat intake is linked with cardiovascular disease. This study adds to previous research suggesting that a modest amount of cheese may actually have nutritional advantages that balance out the fat content.

It’s important to note that even this study found no benefit to eating more than about 40g of cheese a day – about a matchbox sized piece.

Low fat cheeses (that contain 17.5g of fat per 100g, or less) may be the healthiest option for a “daily portion”.

Read more healthy eating advice about dairy products.

Where did the story come from?

The study was carried out by researchers from Soochow University, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University and Yili Industrial Group in China. Yili Group is a large producer of dairy goods in China, although it doesn’t seem to produce cheese.

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest, although three of them work for Yili Industrial Group. The paper includes no information about funding for the research. It was published in the peer-reviewed European Journal of Nutrition.

The Independent and the Mail Online both greeted the study with enthusiasm, with the Independent suggesting it gives people permission to indulge in a “festive cheese board” at Christmas. However, “indulging” may be a step too far, as most people would be “cheesed off” to have a cheese board with only 40g of cheese.

What kind of research was this?

The study is a meta-analysis of prospective observational studies looking at how cheese consumption was linked with overall cardiovascular disease or specific events like stroke.

A meta-analysis pools the data from different studies to give an overall result. Observational studies can highlight patterns, but cannot show that one factor (such as cheese consumption) directly causes another (such as reduced chance of heart attack or stroke).

Dietary trials would be needed to show this, though they are notoriously difficult to organise in a real-world setting. It can be hard to recruit enough people and ensure they follow a set dietary intake for sufficient time to look at long term health outcomes.

What did the research involve?

Researchers looked for studies that measured people’s consumption of cheese through dietary questionnaires, then followed them up to see what happened to them. They focused on studies that collected data on coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease and stroke.

For each of these outcomes, they compared reported “high” versus “low” daily cheese consumption, where “high” was around 40g a day. They then looked at the effects of cheese consumption by amount (gram per day). They pooled the results and presented them as relative risk figures, although the per gram figures were presented only by graph.

The studies were assessed for quality and the researchers checked for publication bias (where studies with positive findings are more likely to get published).

What were the basic results?

People regularly eating “high” compared with “low” amounts of cheese were less likely to have any type of cardiovascular disease, heart disease or stroke:

  • risk of any type of cardiovascular disease was reduced by 10% (relative risk (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 0.99)
  • risk of heart disease was reduced by 14% (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.96)
  • risk of stroke was reduced by 10% (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97)

Results suggest eating less than 40g per day and eating more than 40g a day would hypothetically increase your risk of cardiovascular diseases, compared to eating 40g a day.

The analysis found some evidence of publication bias, suggesting that smaller trials that had a negative result (found an increased risk of cardiovascular disease with cheese consumption) might not have been published.

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers said: “we found that high compared with low cheese consumption was significantly associated with 10-14% lower risks of CVD [cardiovascular disease]”. They suggest this may be because cheese is a good source of dietary vitamins, minerals and protein, and that the risks of saturated fat may be more relevant to fat in meat than in dairy products.

Conclusion

Cheese is a common part of many people’s diets, with people in Europe eating an average 17.9kg a year, or 49g a day.

This study suggests eating modest amounts of cheese is unlikely to do harm, and may have a small protective effect on heart health.

However, cheese is high in fat and calories. Both being obese and having a diet high in saturated fat are known to be linked with cardiovascular disease. So for overall health people should limit how much saturated fat they eat. In this study, the maximum reduction in risk of cardiovascular disease was seen by people eating about 40g a day – less than the European average. Even then, these were still fairly small relative risk reductions.

The study has limitations, mainly that observational studies cannot prove that cheese directly affects heart and cardiovascular health. The researchers say the individual studies took account of a variety of potentially confounding factors, but there may still be factors that were not accounted for.

In particular we don’t know what the participants’ overall diets were like, for example whether people were eating other dairy products alongside cheese.

Also, when people are asked about their food consumption, they may not always estimate their intake accurately. As most of the studies took place in Europe or the US, we don’t know whether the results apply to populations in parts of the world where dairy foods are less common.

Overall the study adds to the body of existing research looking at whether dairy food and saturated fat are good or bad for us. Dairy products can be a healthy component of your diet, but the best take home message is everything in moderation.

Find out more about dairy products as part of a healthy, balanced diet.

Analysis by Bazian
Edited by NHS Choices

[siteorigin_widget class=”WP_Widget_Recent_Posts”][/siteorigin_widget]

Discover more from The Training Network

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Previous Posts

Four classical musicians performing a string quartet in a nineteenth-century rehearsal room, illustrating Baumol’s cost disease and the limits of NHS productivity. NHS productivity and patient pathways

Anita

NHS productivity isn’t simply about working harder or treating more patients. Roy Lilley explores how shorter patient journeys, fewer interfaces and smarter pathways could transform healthcare efficiency without compromising care.

Read More »
Unfinished concrete bridge ending abruptly above a valley while a high-speed train races along a separate track towards the distant horizon. AI transformation in the NHS

Horizon

AI has arrived before the NHS is ready. Regulation, infrastructure, accountability and digital foundations remain unfinished, leaving healthcare racing to complete yesterday’s modernisation while tomorrow’s transformation accelerates beyond it.

Read More »
Overhead view of a senior management meeting room after a meeting, with a long table covered in briefing papers, notebooks, laptops, water glasses and coffee cups. Empty chairs surround the table while two officials leave the room in the background. NHS England abolition feasibility

Responsibilities

Abolishing NHS England was supposed to simplify management and save billions. Instead, workforce, legal and financial complications raise an awkward question: who decided this enormous reorganisation was actually feasible?

Read More »
NHS finance staff working on spreadsheets in a hospital office beside a busy clinical ward. NHS pension contribution £5.4bn saving

Spreadsheet

Britain may be run less by ministers than Treasury spreadsheets. NHS pension assumptions could release £5.4bn, raising a bigger question: will the NHS benefit, or will Treasury take it back?

Read More »
Staff outside Quarry House in Leeds, the NHS’s northern headquarters. NHS devolution and regional power

Power

Moving NHS managers and ministers from London to Leeds is not devolution. Real reform means transferring power, budgets and authority to regions, not simply relocating command-and-control bureaucracy further north again.

Read More »
Busy NHS community health centre waiting area with patients seated while nurses and clinical staff move between reception and consulting rooms. NHS Neighbourhood Health

Plug

Neighbourhood Health is the NHS’s eighth attempt to shift care from hospitals into communities. Without proven targets, extra capacity, workforce and double-running money, history looks likely to repeat itself again.

Read More »
Female GP prepares for the working day in a GP consultation room, with a computer, examination couch and blood sample tubes visible. NHS prostate cancer PSA testing policy

Newspaper

A quiet change to NHS prostate cancer testing shifts power from informed patients towards GP judgement, raising serious questions about transparency, inequality, evidence, cost and the future of PSA testing.

Read More »
A working mother sits in her parked car outside a UK care home, overcome with emotion after visiting her mother with dementia while balancing work and family responsibilities. Andy Burnham social care reform

Answers

Andy Burnham’s social care reforms promise fairness for families, but funding alone cannot solve workforce shortages, capacity constraints or NHS integration. After seventeen years, voters deserve detailed answers, not aspirations.

Read More »