picture of hourglass

Choice

I sat in the morning sun, watching the river.

The sky was gin clear and as blue as the blue eyes of Modigliani’s Woman.

Old Father Thames was done with the high-tide and was letting-go the water. A brief moment before the beginnings of low-water. An ebb-tide.

Not a breath of breeze disturbed the calm. The sun joined in with the moment by dancing its light, sparkling, dazzling on the surface of the water.

A magic moment of joy, that only nature or perhaps your God can provide. A precious moment.

It’s moments like this that makes me think that I am overdrawn on my threescore years and ten. Seldom a day goes by, as I nudge three score and a lot more… I wonder, how many more.

How will it end?  

Perhaps, confused and careless I’ll drown in an oatmeal latte in Starbucks.  

Perhaps, I’ll slip in the shower and be discovered when a nasty smell pervades the landing?  

Perhaps, a masked assassin from the DH’ secret-service will finish me off. I’ll be found in an alleyway.  

Perhaps, some awful illness will invade me and I’ll be left begging to be released.

Perhaps, Baucus will hand me to Morpheus and I’ll know nothing about it.

If you are the same age as me, the recent discussions about the end-of-life will be weighing heavily on your mind.

The debate is dominated by young, middle-class, healthy people who will claim to know better. 

Or, the discussion will be hijacked by people who are facing their end and have made up their minds.

The rest of us are left wondering about the ‘perhaps’ of life.

If we look to the Health Secretary for direction, we’ll be disappointed.

Streeting, once a supporter of assisted dying has now devised a cunning escape from controversy. He says; without the support of end of life care, ‘which is broken, like the rest of the NHS’, there is a false choice and it’s the Tories fault… he can’t make up his mind.

As he is with most things, he is wrong.

In 2013, in global rankings, the NHS was number one for end-of-life care… access, specialised staff, community engagement and a strong hospice movement. Same again in 2016.

In January 2022 the Duke, global health institute ranked UK the best.

Like everything else, Covid has taken its toll on services. If end-of-life care services have slipped, (and it’s not looking good) we know where they could and should be. It’s not irretrievable. It’s Streeting’s job to fix it and remove any impediment from the equation of decision. 

Others say it’s against their religious beliefs. Faithful worship brings its own dilemma… to impose well-held beliefs on others goes beyond faith and can border on bullying. 

So, we are left with the question I meuse at the beginning… what about the end?

It is nobody’s business but MPs have to make it their business.  

The average age of an MP has dropped from 50, with the latest intake, to 46.

What do they know about old age or the dread of illness? Few will have experienced living in a crippling cul-de-sac of illness or disability.  

They can still cut their own toenails, get out of bed, run upstairs, stand on a bus and cook their own tea. Unscrew a jam jar and start their day without painkillers and sleep o’nite without tablets. Their risk of dying enhanced only by the subsidised booze in the House of Commons bar.

It’s nobody’s business but in today’s social-media society, it’s made everyone’s business.  

What about the sinister business of juicy assets and squabbling relatives, eager to inherit.

What about relieving an exhausted partner unable to carry the burden of care.

What about the friend or relative desperate to help but reduced, by law, to a spectator, for fear of 14 years in prison, to punish any act of compassion.

What about the hundreds of scenarios the variety of life and how we live it can throw up, that might give others a say in our private end.

What about making a law; no-one who helps someone to commit suicide, providing they are not acting out of selfish motives, can be punished.

Sitting watching the light sparkling on the ever changing tide…

… might be the moment.

This is all about a word so often used in our care services, so often devalued and counterfeited… choice.

Don’t try and tell me how my story ends, only I know what I have loved and lost, squandered and cherished. Given too little and taken too much. What burden can be borne and what cannot.

This is the biggest choice we can ever make. A choice we won’t live to regret.

I will know if the time is right to make my choice. So will you. All the rest have one job… … make sure we have the choice. 

News and Comment from Roy Lilley
Contact Roy – please use this e-address roy.lilley@nhsmanagers.net
Reproduced at thetrainingnet.com by kind permission of Roy Lilley.


Discover more from The Training Network

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Previous Posts

Four classical musicians performing a string quartet in a nineteenth-century rehearsal room, illustrating Baumol’s cost disease and the limits of NHS productivity. NHS productivity and patient pathways

Anita

NHS productivity isn’t simply about working harder or treating more patients. Roy Lilley explores how shorter patient journeys, fewer interfaces and smarter pathways could transform healthcare efficiency without compromising care.

Read More »
Unfinished concrete bridge ending abruptly above a valley while a high-speed train races along a separate track towards the distant horizon. AI transformation in the NHS

Horizon

AI has arrived before the NHS is ready. Regulation, infrastructure, accountability and digital foundations remain unfinished, leaving healthcare racing to complete yesterday’s modernisation while tomorrow’s transformation accelerates beyond it.

Read More »
Overhead view of a senior management meeting room after a meeting, with a long table covered in briefing papers, notebooks, laptops, water glasses and coffee cups. Empty chairs surround the table while two officials leave the room in the background. NHS England abolition feasibility

Responsibilities

Abolishing NHS England was supposed to simplify management and save billions. Instead, workforce, legal and financial complications raise an awkward question: who decided this enormous reorganisation was actually feasible?

Read More »
NHS finance staff working on spreadsheets in a hospital office beside a busy clinical ward. NHS pension contribution £5.4bn saving

Spreadsheet

Britain may be run less by ministers than Treasury spreadsheets. NHS pension assumptions could release £5.4bn, raising a bigger question: will the NHS benefit, or will Treasury take it back?

Read More »
Staff outside Quarry House in Leeds, the NHS’s northern headquarters. NHS devolution and regional power

Power

Moving NHS managers and ministers from London to Leeds is not devolution. Real reform means transferring power, budgets and authority to regions, not simply relocating command-and-control bureaucracy further north again.

Read More »
Busy NHS community health centre waiting area with patients seated while nurses and clinical staff move between reception and consulting rooms. NHS Neighbourhood Health

Plug

Neighbourhood Health is the NHS’s eighth attempt to shift care from hospitals into communities. Without proven targets, extra capacity, workforce and double-running money, history looks likely to repeat itself again.

Read More »
Female GP prepares for the working day in a GP consultation room, with a computer, examination couch and blood sample tubes visible. NHS prostate cancer PSA testing policy

Newspaper

A quiet change to NHS prostate cancer testing shifts power from informed patients towards GP judgement, raising serious questions about transparency, inequality, evidence, cost and the future of PSA testing.

Read More »
A working mother sits in her parked car outside a UK care home, overcome with emotion after visiting her mother with dementia while balancing work and family responsibilities. Andy Burnham social care reform

Answers

Andy Burnham’s social care reforms promise fairness for families, but funding alone cannot solve workforce shortages, capacity constraints or NHS integration. After seventeen years, voters deserve detailed answers, not aspirations.

Read More »