Implementing Fundamental Changes to a GP Practice

Numerous challenges presently face GP practices in their position as the principal providers of primary health care in the UK. These challenges, which include increasing workloads, reducing investment, treasury demands for increased efficiency, crises in recruitment, new procurement and tendering regulations, additional patient demands and increasing competition from the private sector have caused many partners to consider the operation of their own practice and to ask themselves whether it is equipped to respond effectively to these demands. Certain partners may reach the conclusion that their practices need only modest adaptations to their organisation, systems, procedures, processes and underlying ethos. Others, however, may decide that a far more fundamental overhaul of the practice is necessary. For those that do require a radical organisational change there are two key requisites to its successful implementation.
1. Agreeing the Need for Change
Any programme to make significant changes to a practice which does not have the agreement of the majority of partners is likely to fail. There may well be those within the partnership who are opposed to change. The reasons for this are likely to be varied but might include fear of the unknown, an inability to perceive any benefits from the proposed changes, a continuing attachment to the “Old Way”, a lack of self-confidence and a lack of confidence in the partners who are advocating change.
Where those advocating change believe that the case for it is clearly made out, it is their responsibility to work sympathetically with the “objectors” to ascertain the reason for their opposition in each individual case, work sympathetically towards alleviating concerns, provide a clear demonstration as to why there is a need for change and set out clearly the benefits to the practice, its practitioners, staff and patients. Whilst it may not be possible to change firmly fixed mindsets, the aim must be to create an environment where the partnership agrees to work together despite the fact that opinions may remain varied.
Clear lines of communication, founded on mutual professional respect, should be drawn with the intention of enabling sceptical partners to join in with the process of change rather than have it forced upon them. In a professional GP’s practice, evolution is far more likely to constitute a firm foundation-stone for change than revolution, which is almost certain to create more problems than it addresses.
2. Managing the Changes
Although the agreement and ownership of the evolution of the partnership by the partners themselves is critical to its success, the way in which the change is implemented is also crucial from the point of view of carrying along the clinical and non-clinical staff and the patients. This is particularly relevant where the evolution of the practice involves (or is perceived to involve) a change in its culture.
The reorganisation of a practice, which is likely to address matters such as the optimisation of costs, the modification of internal processes, a review of staff competencies and efficiencies, revenue development and practice leadership is likely to have a significant impact on every member of the team. It will therefore be essential to the successful implementation of change that the partners ensure that it is properly managed.
As we have already alluded to, persuading all the partners that there is a need to change may not be straightforward. The same applies to the workforce of a practice and it is equally critical that the staff team, particularly those who are most influential within that team, opt in to the proposals. Well-informed, mature and resourceful employees should be enabled by the partnership to overcome any fears that they may have, search for ways to adjust to the proposed changes and flourish under the new culture.
The key to achieving both of these imperatives is communication within the partnership itself and with the workforce from the partners down. Open, clear and frank explanations for the reason behind the proposed change, how the practice and its staff team will be affected by it, what is expected from the workforce in terms of implementation and, of course, how the partners, the practice, the staff and the patients are likely to benefit from the consequent re-organisation will be crucial to the eventual outcome.
Article written by Mark EdwardsPrevious news
the pressures facing gps

cqc logo


Discover more from The Training Network

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Previous Posts

Four classical musicians performing a string quartet in a nineteenth-century rehearsal room, illustrating Baumol’s cost disease and the limits of NHS productivity. NHS productivity and patient pathways

Anita

NHS productivity isn’t simply about working harder or treating more patients. Roy Lilley explores how shorter patient journeys, fewer interfaces and smarter pathways could transform healthcare efficiency without compromising care.

Read More »
Unfinished concrete bridge ending abruptly above a valley while a high-speed train races along a separate track towards the distant horizon. AI transformation in the NHS

Horizon

AI has arrived before the NHS is ready. Regulation, infrastructure, accountability and digital foundations remain unfinished, leaving healthcare racing to complete yesterday’s modernisation while tomorrow’s transformation accelerates beyond it.

Read More »
Overhead view of a senior management meeting room after a meeting, with a long table covered in briefing papers, notebooks, laptops, water glasses and coffee cups. Empty chairs surround the table while two officials leave the room in the background. NHS England abolition feasibility

Responsibilities

Abolishing NHS England was supposed to simplify management and save billions. Instead, workforce, legal and financial complications raise an awkward question: who decided this enormous reorganisation was actually feasible?

Read More »
NHS finance staff working on spreadsheets in a hospital office beside a busy clinical ward. NHS pension contribution £5.4bn saving

Spreadsheet

Britain may be run less by ministers than Treasury spreadsheets. NHS pension assumptions could release £5.4bn, raising a bigger question: will the NHS benefit, or will Treasury take it back?

Read More »
Staff outside Quarry House in Leeds, the NHS’s northern headquarters. NHS devolution and regional power

Power

Moving NHS managers and ministers from London to Leeds is not devolution. Real reform means transferring power, budgets and authority to regions, not simply relocating command-and-control bureaucracy further north again.

Read More »
Busy NHS community health centre waiting area with patients seated while nurses and clinical staff move between reception and consulting rooms. NHS Neighbourhood Health

Plug

Neighbourhood Health is the NHS’s eighth attempt to shift care from hospitals into communities. Without proven targets, extra capacity, workforce and double-running money, history looks likely to repeat itself again.

Read More »
Female GP prepares for the working day in a GP consultation room, with a computer, examination couch and blood sample tubes visible. NHS prostate cancer PSA testing policy

Newspaper

A quiet change to NHS prostate cancer testing shifts power from informed patients towards GP judgement, raising serious questions about transparency, inequality, evidence, cost and the future of PSA testing.

Read More »
A working mother sits in her parked car outside a UK care home, overcome with emotion after visiting her mother with dementia while balancing work and family responsibilities. Andy Burnham social care reform

Answers

Andy Burnham’s social care reforms promise fairness for families, but funding alone cannot solve workforce shortages, capacity constraints or NHS integration. After seventeen years, voters deserve detailed answers, not aspirations.

Read More »