Cartoon of Alan Milburn handing a healthcare voucher to a doubtful man, symbolising NHS reforms and loss of patient voice.

Voucher

Back in the days when beer was tuppence a pint and you could get drunk for a shilling…

… a pair of step ladders, dust-sheets, a pot of white paint and a nine inch brush, parked in the middle of an empty hospital ward, was not an unfamiliar sight.

The only way hospital bosses could balance their budgets was to slow down elective surgery.

The problem was… the local Community Health Council would have to be consulted and they would never agree to ward closures.

The Councils comprised local councillors, voluntary sector, community leaders and the public.

They were tough…

… knew the hospitals, knew the managers, knew the patients, knew the public, and…

… they also knew they couldn’t stop hospitals closing wards for redecoration!

Both sides knew what was happening and they coexisted in the subterfuge. They were formidable, committed people.

In 2001 Alan Milburn (yes, him again), abolished them.

Various iterations of public engagement followed, nothing really worked. In 2013, Healthwatch emerged.

Now Milburn is back, running the NHS again, guess what… Healthwatch is being abolished.

Without a statutory body empowered to challenge local decisions, NHS organisations will face less public scrutiny.

That risks decisions being made more for organisational convenience or financial targets than for patient need.

We saw it last week, with the league tables. Made entirely useless for the public by the weighting given to finance… obscuring all other issues.

CHCs had legal rights of entry into hospitals and the ability to hold boards to account.

Healthwatch, though weaker, still gathered intelligence and evidence on patient experience.

The loss of that leaves patients with fewer routes to escalate concerns.

Instead of a single recognisable voice, feedback risks being scattered across charities, campaign groups and social media outrage…

… which makes it easier for HMG and NHSE to dismiss dissent as anecdotal.

A publicly funded service needs visible mechanisms for the public to be heard.

Without that, trust declines and the sense of the NHS being ‘ours’ diminishes.

Milburn is a managerialist with a market-facing view of the NHS. His moves often tilt towards making the service easier to reshape, centralise, or open to new providers.

It seems to me he thinks public-voice-structures slow reform, gum up decision-making, or get ‘captured’ by activists. I think I recall that was his criticism of CHCs all those years ago.

Removing an organised public voice makes it easier for ministers to push through difficult reorganisations, cuts, or market reforms without a statutory check.

I’ve always thought he tended to favour patient choice and consumerism…

… the concept of the individual voting with their feet…

… as more powerful than collective structures like CHCs.

The closure of Healthwatch reflects that same preference…

… let individuals speak through choice of provider, surveys and digital feedback, not through a statutory body.

The loss of Healthwatch continues a long trajectory away from collective, statutory patient-power, towards individualised, consumer-style feedback.

The risk is… it hollows out democratic legitimacy in a service the public fund and cherish, but…

… choice is illusory.

Most patients want timely, safe, decent care at their nearest hospital. They don’t want to shop around… particularly if they are unwell.

For many services, there is only one local option, so the competitive dynamic Milburn envisaged, never really materialises.

Emergency care is not elective. You don’t choose your A&E when you’re in an ambulance.

Even for planned surgery, choice is narrowed by clinical advice, transport links, post-procedure follow-up and family support.

Competition hasn’t delivered. Studies of NHS market-style reforms show negligible impact on quality and the administrative burden often outweigh benefits.

Competition always increases costs, by duplicating back-office functions and incentivising ‘gaming’ of performance metrics.

What raises quality is usually collaboration, multidisciplinary teams, integrated care pathways, sharing expertise. Competition pulls in the opposite direction, encouraging silos and duplication.

Patients value voice over choice.

What people consistently say they want is influence… the ability to have their concerns heard, their local services shaped by local needs and their complaints acted upon.

CHCs, however imperfect, gave that. Healthwatch is an echo of it and now dumped.

Milburn dismantled CHCs in the name of modernisation, pushed choice as the public voice, but the reality is…

… the public never wanted to behave as consumers.

They wanted to be citizens with a voice…

… not customers with a voucher.


News and Comment from Roy Lilley
Contact Roy – please use this e-address roy.lilley@nhsmanagers.net

Reproduced at thetrainingnet.com by kind permission of Roy Lilley.


Discover more from The Training Network

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Previous Posts

Four classical musicians performing a string quartet in a nineteenth-century rehearsal room, illustrating Baumol’s cost disease and the limits of NHS productivity. NHS productivity and patient pathways

Anita

NHS productivity isn’t simply about working harder or treating more patients. Roy Lilley explores how shorter patient journeys, fewer interfaces and smarter pathways could transform healthcare efficiency without compromising care.

Read More »
Unfinished concrete bridge ending abruptly above a valley while a high-speed train races along a separate track towards the distant horizon. AI transformation in the NHS

Horizon

AI has arrived before the NHS is ready. Regulation, infrastructure, accountability and digital foundations remain unfinished, leaving healthcare racing to complete yesterday’s modernisation while tomorrow’s transformation accelerates beyond it.

Read More »
Overhead view of a senior management meeting room after a meeting, with a long table covered in briefing papers, notebooks, laptops, water glasses and coffee cups. Empty chairs surround the table while two officials leave the room in the background. NHS England abolition feasibility

Responsibilities

Abolishing NHS England was supposed to simplify management and save billions. Instead, workforce, legal and financial complications raise an awkward question: who decided this enormous reorganisation was actually feasible?

Read More »
NHS finance staff working on spreadsheets in a hospital office beside a busy clinical ward. NHS pension contribution £5.4bn saving

Spreadsheet

Britain may be run less by ministers than Treasury spreadsheets. NHS pension assumptions could release £5.4bn, raising a bigger question: will the NHS benefit, or will Treasury take it back?

Read More »
Staff outside Quarry House in Leeds, the NHS’s northern headquarters. NHS devolution and regional power

Power

Moving NHS managers and ministers from London to Leeds is not devolution. Real reform means transferring power, budgets and authority to regions, not simply relocating command-and-control bureaucracy further north again.

Read More »
Busy NHS community health centre waiting area with patients seated while nurses and clinical staff move between reception and consulting rooms. NHS Neighbourhood Health

Plug

Neighbourhood Health is the NHS’s eighth attempt to shift care from hospitals into communities. Without proven targets, extra capacity, workforce and double-running money, history looks likely to repeat itself again.

Read More »
Female GP prepares for the working day in a GP consultation room, with a computer, examination couch and blood sample tubes visible. NHS prostate cancer PSA testing policy

Newspaper

A quiet change to NHS prostate cancer testing shifts power from informed patients towards GP judgement, raising serious questions about transparency, inequality, evidence, cost and the future of PSA testing.

Read More »
A working mother sits in her parked car outside a UK care home, overcome with emotion after visiting her mother with dementia while balancing work and family responsibilities. Andy Burnham social care reform

Answers

Andy Burnham’s social care reforms promise fairness for families, but funding alone cannot solve workforce shortages, capacity constraints or NHS integration. After seventeen years, voters deserve detailed answers, not aspirations.

Read More »